Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6vsBMW X6 (F16) 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (F16)
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,884 kg4,154 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X6 (F16) 35i
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | BMWX6 (F16)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,884kg4,154lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Gross weight | 2,570kg5,666lb | 2,740kg6,041lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 988km614mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 200g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (F16) 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 5,800-6,400 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | BMWX6 (F16)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW X6 (F16) 35i has 6 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 6.4 s |
Although BMW X6 (F16) 35i has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 988 km 614 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)35i |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)35i | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6 | BMWX6 (F16)35i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 988 km 614 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 200 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 | BMW X6 (F16) 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 141 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 112 km (69 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 41 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW X6 (F16) 35i
- Has 6 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























