Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6

  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,884 kg
    4,154 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,100 km
    684 mi
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    160 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
300hp224kW
310hp231kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,884kg4,154lb
1,941kg4,279lb
Gross weight
2,570kg5,666lb
2,450kg5,401lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
70.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,100km684mi
Calculated
910km566mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
4,688mm185in
Width
2,070mm81in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
650L
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
71L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,100 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
23.6 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
1,884 kg
4,154 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
1,941 kg
4,279 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V66.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
1,100 km
684 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
5.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,884 kg
4,154 lb
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,100 km
684 mi
910 km
566 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6

  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Is 57 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 145 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0d V6
3.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
3.0d V6
2.0 P300
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
3.0d V6
35i
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsBMWX6 (F16)35i
2.0 T6
3.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
3.0d V6
35i
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0 T6
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
3.0d V6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster