Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,941 kg4,279 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,941kg4,279lb | 2,146kg4,731lb |
| Gross weight | 2,450kg5,401lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 855km532mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 1,941 kg 4,279 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 910 km 566 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 855 km 532 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,941 kg 4,279 lb | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 855 km 532 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Has 191 L more trunk volume
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























