Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 35ivsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

35i

306 hp2979 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0t

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    174 g/km
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

BMW X6 (F16) 35i

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    988 km
    614 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)35iJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
306hp228kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,025kg4,464lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Gross weight
2,740kg6,041lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
70.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
27.1s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
988km614mi
Calculated
818km508mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,746mm187in
Width
1,989mm78in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,667mm66in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
550L
463L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
650L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
63L
CO2 emissions
200g/km
174g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 35iJaguar F-Pace 2.0tPowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 35i: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)35i5,800-6,400 rpm1,200-5,000 rpm6,650 rpm
JaguarF-Pace2.0t5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)35iJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.1 s
25.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
306 hp
228 kW
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
300 hp
224 kW

BMW X6 (F16) 35i has 6 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
240 km/h
149 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i6.4 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t6.0 s

Although BMW X6 (F16) 35i has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
988 km
614 mi
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
818 km
508 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)35i
306 hp
228 kW
6.4 s
240 km/h
149 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)35i
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.4 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)35i
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)35iJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
306 hp
228 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.0 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Range score
988 km
614 mi
818 km
508 mi
CO2 score
200 g/km
174 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 35iJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 35i

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 170 km (106 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 87 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Is 255 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 26 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 35i
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 35i vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t - car comparison - FastVsFaster