Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

3.0 TDI

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0t

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,048 km
    651 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
286hp213kW
300hp224kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,870kg4,123lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Gross weight
2,550kg5,622lb
-
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
65.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
70.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
23.4s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,048km651mi
Calculated
818km508mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,746mm187in
Width
1,893mm75in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,667mm66in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance-
213mm8in
Trunk volume
550L
463L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
650L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
63L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
174g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDIJaguar F-Pace 2.0tPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI3,750-4,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarF-Pace2.0t5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.4 s
25.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
300 hp
224 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has 14 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI5.8 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t6.0 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
1,048 km
651 mi
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
818 km
508 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
5.8 s
237 km/h
147 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
300 hp
224 kW
6.0 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.8 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
286 hp
213 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Range score
1,048 km
651 mi
818 km
508 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
174 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDIJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI

  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 87 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t - car comparison - FastVsFaster