AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | - |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,048km651mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 463L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 300 hp 224 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has 14 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 5.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 6.0 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,048 km 651 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.8 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,048 km 651 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 463 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























