AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6vsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
3.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,870 kg4,123 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful299 hp223 kW
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,700kg5,952lb | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 956km594mi Calculated | 1,048km651mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,647mm65in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,621mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 3,620-3,750 rpm | 1,500-3,620 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 108 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6 has 13 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 5.0 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 956 km 594 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 1,048 km 651 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.8 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 956 km 594 mi | 1,048 km 651 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6 | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 3.0 TDI V6
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 93 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























