Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsMaserati Levante 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Levante
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score88/100
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 85.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 914km568mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,687mm185in | 5,003mm197in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,968mm77in |
| Height | 1,671mm66in | 1,679mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 3,004mm118in |
| Front track | 1,613mm64in | 1,624mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,676mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 580L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Maserati Levante 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,600 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 5 hp more than Maserati Levante 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 5.7 s |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Maserati Levante 3.0 V6: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 914 km 568 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 | Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 545 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 197 km (122 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























