Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 250 2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    217 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,804 kg
    3,977 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    173 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,804kg3,977lb
2,151kg4,742lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
77.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
37.5s
Calculated
47.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
829km515mi
Calculated
877km545mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,803mm189in
4,950mm195in
Width
2,032mm80in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,665mm66in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,644mm65in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,663mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
251mm10in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
673L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,731L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
71L
CO2 emissions
173g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.5 s
47.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
1,804 kg
3,977 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.06.7 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
829 km
515 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.7 s
217 km/h
135 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,804 kg
3,977 lb
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
Fuel consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
829 km
515 mi
877 km
545 mi
CO2 score
173 g/km
189 g/km
Trunk score
673 L
23.8 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.30 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.40 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,995 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 347 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 359 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
P 250 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
P 250 2.0
2.0 P250
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
P 250 2.0
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
P 250 2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
P 250 2.0
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 T5
GLS 350d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
P 250 2.0
45 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster