Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,897 kg4,182 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range877 km545 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,897kg4,182lb | 2,151kg4,742lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.2s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 812km504mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,664mm66in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 793L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,842L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.2 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,897 kg 4,182 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 812 km 504 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.3 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,897 kg 4,182 lb | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 812 km 504 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 254 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 479 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























