Car comparison

Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Equinox III

550T

260 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    353 Nm
    260 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    431 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    877 km
    545 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletEquinox III550TVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
260hp194kW
250hp186kW
Torque
353Nm260lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,710kg3,770lb
2,151kg4,742lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
47.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
711km442mi
Calculated
877km545mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,652mm183in
4,950mm195in
Width
1,843mm73in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,693mm67in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,725mm107in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,573mm62in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance-
238mm9in
Trunk volume
431L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,505L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
71L
CO2 emissions-
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Equinox III 550TVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletEquinox III550T5,500 rpm2,000-5,300 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletEquinox III550TVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
47.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
260 hp
194 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 10 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T7.8 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
711 km
442 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletEquinox III550T
260 hp
194 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletEquinox III550TVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
260 hp
194 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
711 km
442 mi
877 km
545 mi
CO2 score
-
189 g/km
Trunk score
431 L
15.2 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Equinox III 550TVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 3 Nm more
  • Is 441 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 117 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

550T
650T
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
550T
2.0 T5
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
550T
25t
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
550T
2.0 P250
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
550T
30d
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsBMWX7 (G07)30d
550T
3.3 MPi
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
GLS 350d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
550T
300
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
550T
1.5T
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster