Chevrolet Equinox III
Car comparison
Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque353 Nm260 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range711 km442 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score85/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Largest trunk501 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletEquinox III550T | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,787kg3,940lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,309kg5,090lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 46.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 638km397mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,652mm183in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,646mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,659mm105in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | 501L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,505L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletEquinox III550T | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 46.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 22 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 7.8 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.4 s |
Although Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has more power, Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 711 km 442 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 638 km 397 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletEquinox III550T | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 638 km 397 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Equinox III 550T | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 3 Nm more
- Is 77 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























