Chevrolet Equinox III
Car comparison
Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsJaguar F-Pace 25t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
25t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletEquinox III550T | JaguarF-Pace25t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 79.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 1,065km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,652mm183in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,505L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 25t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletEquinox III550T | JaguarF-Pace25t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW |
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 25t.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25t and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.0 s |
Although Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 25t is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25t and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25t and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 711 km 442 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,065 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 25t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletEquinox III550T | JaguarF-Pace25t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 1,065 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Equinox III 550T | Jaguar F-Pace 25t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Has 12 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 354 km (220 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























