Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsJaguar F-Pace 25t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
25t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,795 kg3,957 lb
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | JaguarF-Pace25t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 79.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.3s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 802km499mi Calculated | 1,065km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,696mm185in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 205mm8in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 25t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 5,000-6,750 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | JaguarF-Pace25t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.3 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 25t has 5 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 25t: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 6.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.0 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 25t has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 25t: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 802 km 499 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,065 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | JaguarF-Pace25t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 802 km 499 mi | 1,065 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 | Jaguar F-Pace 25t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Has 5 hp more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 262 km (163 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























