Car comparison

Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsHyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Equinox III

550T

260 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021
VS

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015

3.3 MPi

270 hp3342 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    353 Nm
    260 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletEquinox III550THyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
260hp194kW
270hp201kW
Torque
353Nm260lb-ft
318Nm235lb-ft
Curb weight
1,710kg3,770lb
1,758kg3,876lb
Gross weight-
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
89.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
41.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
711km442mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
3,342cc204cu in
Length
4,652mm183in
4,700mm185in
Width
1,843mm73in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,693mm67in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,725mm107in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,573mm62in
1,633mm64in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,644mm65in
Trunk volume
431L
1,680L
Max trunk volume
1,505L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
-
CO2 emissions-
245g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Equinox III 550THyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPiPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletEquinox III550T5,500 rpm2,000-5,300 rpm5,750 rpm
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi6,400 rpm5,300 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletEquinox III550THyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
41.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
92 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
260 hp
194 kW
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
270 hp
201 kW

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi has 10 hp more than Chevrolet Equinox III 550T.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
318 Nm
235 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
1,758 kg
3,876 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T7.8 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi8.5 s

Although Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi has more power, Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletEquinox III550T
260 hp
194 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
270 hp
201 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,680 L
59.3 cu ft
Length
4,700 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletEquinox III550THyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
260 hp
194 kW
270 hp
201 kW
Torque
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
318 Nm
235 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
1,758 kg
3,876 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,680 L
59.3 cu ft
Length
4,700 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
711 km
442 mi
-
CO2 score
-
245 g/km
Trunk score
431 L
15.2 cu ft
1,680 L
59.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Equinox III 550THyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T

  • Has 35 Nm more
  • Is 48 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 1,249 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) 3.3 MPi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

550T
650T
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsChevroletBlazer650T
3.3 MPi
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
550T
2.0 T5
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
3.3 MPi
450d V8
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
550T
2.0 T5
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
3.3 MPi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
550T
25t
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsJaguarF-Pace25t
550T
2.0 P250
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
550T
30d
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsBMWX7 (G07)30d
3.3 MPi
GLS 350d
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
550T
2.0i
VS
ChevroletEquinox III550TvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 MPi
3.6 FSI V6
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T vs Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi - car comparison - FastVsFaster