Chevrolet Equinox III
Car comparison
Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Best estimated range812 km504 mi
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletEquinox III550T | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,897kg4,182lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 82.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 40.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 812km504mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,652mm183in | 4,747mm187in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,664mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | 793L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,505L | 1,842L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletEquinox III550T | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 40.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,897 kg 4,182 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 7.3 s |
Although Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has more power, Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 711 km 442 mi |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 812 km 504 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.3 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletEquinox III550T | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,897 kg 4,182 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 812 km 504 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Equinox III 550T | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 187 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 12 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
- Has 362 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























