Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0i

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,094 km
    680 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,897 kg
    4,182 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    793 L
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
254hp189kW
250hp186kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,950kg4,299lb
1,897kg4,182lb
Gross weight
2,516kg5,547lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
84.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
82.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
35.1s
Calculated
40.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,094km680mi
Calculated
812km504mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,747mm187in
Width
1,890mm74in
2,071mm82in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,664mm66in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,656mm65in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
477L
793L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,842L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
82L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.1 s
40.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 4 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1,897 kg
4,182 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D7.4 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i7.3 s

Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 4.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,094 km
680 mi
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
812 km
504 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
254 hp
189 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
1,897 kg
4,182 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Range score
1,094 km
680 mi
812 km
504 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km17.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi28.45 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year2,651 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 185 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 282 km (176 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Is 53 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 316 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
25t
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-Pace25t
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0i
2.0 P250
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 B5
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0i
2.0
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0i
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster