Car comparison

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIvsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Tarraco

2.0 TSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Lightest
    1,698 kg
    3,743 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    700 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,094 km
    680 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatTarraco2.0 TSIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
245hp183kW
254hp189kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,698kg3,743lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Gross weight
2,440kg5,379lb
2,516kg5,547lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
67.9s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
27.0s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
652km405mi
Calculated
1,094km680mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,735mm186in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,674mm66in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
2,790mm110in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,574mm62in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume-
477L
Max trunk volume
700L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
60L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DPowerTorque
  • Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI5,250-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatTarraco2.0 TSIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.0 s
35.1 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 9 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1,698 kg
3,743 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
229 km/h
142 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI6.2 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D7.4 s

Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
652 km
405 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,094 km
680 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.2 s
229 km/h
142 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.2 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatTarraco2.0 TSIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
245 hp
183 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lightness
1,698 kg
3,743 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
652 km
405 mi
1,094 km
680 mi
Trunk score
700 L
24.7 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

  • Is 252 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 223 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 442 km (275 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0 TSI
T 2.0
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.0 TSI
25d
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster