BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Tarraco
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk700 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)25d | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,698kg3,743lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 27.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 652km405mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,574mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)25d | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 27.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.6 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 4.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 652 km 405 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)25d | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 652 km 405 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 25d | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 78 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 348 km (216 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 230 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























