Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 II (F3)
45 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted219 km/h136 mph Restricted
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,094 km680 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score93/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Lightest1,776 kg3,915 lb
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 228hp170kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,776kg3,915lb |
| Gross weight | 2,516kg5,547lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 38.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,094km680mi Calculated | 561km348mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,485mm177in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,750 rpm | 1,500-2,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 5,000-6,700 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 38.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 228 hp 170 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 26 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 1,776 kg 3,915 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 5.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,094 km 680 mi |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 561 km 348 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 228 hp 170 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | 1,776 kg 3,915 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,094 km 680 mi | 561 km 348 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 534 km (332 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Is 174 kg lighter
- Has 53 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























