Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240vsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range898 km558 mi
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Lightest1,787 kg3,940 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,926kg4,246lb | 1,787kg3,940lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,309kg5,090lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.3s Calculated | 46.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 898km558mi Calculated | 638km397mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,646mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,659mm105in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 501L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.3 s | 46.4 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 has 2 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 1,926 kg 4,246 lb |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 7.4 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 898 km 558 mi |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 638 km 397 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,926 kg 4,246 lb | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 898 km 558 mi | 638 km 397 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 260 km (162 mi) more estimated range
- Has 733 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Is 139 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























