Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-Pace
2.0 D240
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range898 km558 mi
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Lightest1,795 kg3,957 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,926kg4,246lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 89.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.3s Calculated | 37.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 802km499mi Calculated | 898km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,696mm185in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,634mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 205mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 1,234L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 2,577L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 5,000-6,750 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.3 s | 37.3 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 has 5 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 1,926 kg 4,246 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 6.7 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 802 km 499 mi |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 898 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0 | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,926 kg 4,246 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 802 km 499 mi | 898 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 131 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 734 L more trunk volume
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























