Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,926 kg4,246 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Best estimated range1,145 km712 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,926kg4,246lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | - |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 98.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.3s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 898km558mi Calculated | 1,145km712mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.3 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 has 5 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 1,926 kg 4,246 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 898 km 558 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,145 km 712 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,926 kg 4,246 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 898 km 558 mi | 1,145 km 712 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 279 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 920 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Has 247 km (153 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























