Volvo XC90 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 · Facelift 2007 4.4 V8vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,145 km712 mi
- Largest trunk314 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Lightest2,080 kg4,586 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 315hp235kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Gross weight | 2,590kg5,710lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 98.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.4s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 602km374mi Calculated | 1,145km712mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,414cc269cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,798mm189in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,898mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,743mm69in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 249L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,837L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 5,950 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.4 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 315 hp 235 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 has 80 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 7.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 602 km 374 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,145 km 712 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 315 hp 235 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
| 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 315 hp 235 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 602 km 374 mi | 1,145 km 712 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 249 L 8.8 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.28 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,491 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
- Has 80 hp more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Has 40 Nm more
- Uses 7.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 544 km (338 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























