Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5vsJaguar F-Pace 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,881 kg4,147 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,145 km712 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | JaguarF-Pace25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 1,881kg4,147lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,470kg5,445lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.6s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,145km712mi Calculated | 923km574mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,673mm66in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 314L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 171g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | JaguarF-Pace25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.6 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 25d has 5 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Jaguar F-Pace 25d: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 1,881 kg 4,147 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 25d and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,145 km 712 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 923 km 574 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.2 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25d |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25d | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | JaguarF-Pace25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | 1,881 kg 4,147 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,145 km 712 mi | 923 km 574 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 171 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 | Jaguar F-Pace 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 222 km (138 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar F-Pace 25d
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 324 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























