Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful247 hp184 kW
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,145 km712 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 247hp184kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 98.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 1,145km712mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,336L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has 12 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,145 km 712 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 247 hp 184 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 1,145 km 712 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 525 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 146 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 395 km (246 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























