Volvo XC90 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 · Facelift 2007 4.4 V8vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest2,080 kg4,586 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range877 km545 mi
- Largest trunk314 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 315hp235kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,151kg4,742lb |
| Gross weight | 2,590kg5,710lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.4s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 602km374mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,414cc269cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,798mm189in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,898mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,743mm69in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 249L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,837L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 5,950 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.4 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 315 hp 235 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 has 65 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 5.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 602 km 374 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 315 hp 235 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 |
| 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 315 hp 235 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 602 km 374 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 249 L 8.8 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.28 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,491 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
- Has 65 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 71 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























