Porsche Macan I (95B)
2.0
252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
P 250 2.0
250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions172 g/km
- Best estimated range878 km546 mi
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
- Largest trunk673 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,804kg3,977lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | - |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 878km546mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 2,032mm80in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 185mm7in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 172g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0PowerTorque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 2 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 6.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 6.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 878 km 546 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.7 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 878 km 546 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 172 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 34 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
- Has 173 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsBMWX6 (F16)30d
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i