Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 250 2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,804 kg
    3,977 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    173 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    829 km
    515 mi
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,977kg4,359lb
1,804kg3,977lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
75.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
37.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
829km515mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,902mm75in
-
Height
1,658mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
505L
673L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
63L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
173g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
37.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
95 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
1,804 kg
3,977 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.06.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
829 km
515 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.7 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
1,804 kg
3,977 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
829 km
515 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
173 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 173 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 168 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
P 250 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 T5
30d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsBMWX7 (G07)30d
P 250 2.0
45 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster