Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

45 TFSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 250 2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,750 kg
    3,858 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    172 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    933 km
    580 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,750kg3,858lb
1,804kg3,977lb
Gross weight
2,435kg5,368lb
-
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
74.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
75.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
37.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
933km580mi
Calculated
829km515mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,893mm75in
-
Height
1,659mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance-
251mm10in
Trunk volume
550L
673L
Max trunk volume-
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
63L
CO2 emissions
172g/km
173g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSILand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
37.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
245 hp
183 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 has 5 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
1,804 kg
3,977 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
237 km/h
147 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI6.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.06.7 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
933 km
580 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
829 km
515 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.4 s
237 km/h
147 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.7 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSILand RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
1,804 kg
3,977 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
933 km
580 mi
829 km
515 mi
CO2 score
172 g/km
173 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSILand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 54 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 104 km (65 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 123 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
P 250 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
P 250 2.0
2.0 P250
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
45 TFSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.0 TDI V6
P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
45 TFSI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
P 250 2.0
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster