Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 250 2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    173 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    829 km
    515 mi
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,804kg3,977lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
78.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
77.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
32.3s
Calculated
37.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
802km499mi
Calculated
829km515mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,696mm185in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,923mm76in
2,032mm80in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
205mm8in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
500L
673L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
63L
CO2 emissions
185g/km
173g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.3 s
37.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 has 5 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
1,804 kg
3,977 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.06.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.06.7 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
829 km
515 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.7 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,804 kg
3,977 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
802 km
499 mi
829 km
515 mi
CO2 score
185 g/km
173 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 9 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 173 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
P 250 2.0
2.0t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
P 250 2.0
2.0 P250
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
P 250 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
P 250 2.0
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster