Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsPorsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    178 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,795 kg
    3,957 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    802 km
    499 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
250hp186kW
245hp183kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,977kg4,359lb
1,795kg3,957lb
Gross weight-
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
81.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
78.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
32.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
802km499mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,696mm185in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,624mm64in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,807mm111in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,655mm65in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,651mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
205mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
500L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,500L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
65L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
185g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
32.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
95 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has 5 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.06.7 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
802 km
499 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
185 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 7 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 182 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
30d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsBMWX7 (G07)30d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster