Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsVolkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)

2.0 TSI

249 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    178 g/km
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI

  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,955 kg
    4,310 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    915 km
    568 mi
  • Largest trunk
    810 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
250hp186kW
249hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,977kg4,359lb
1,955kg4,310lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
82.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
33.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
915km568mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,878mm192in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,717mm68in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,904mm114in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,669mm66in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
215mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
810L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,800L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
75L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
188g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
33.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
95 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
249 hp
186 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
1,955 kg
4,310 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI6.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
915 km
568 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
249 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
810 L
28.6 cu ft
Length
4,878 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Power
250 hp
186 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
1,955 kg
4,310 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
810 L
28.6 cu ft
Length
4,878 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
915 km
568 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
188 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
810 L
28.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 22 kg lighter
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 305 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 TSI
6.0 W12 48V Sport
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg I (7L)6.0 W12 48V Sport
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 TSI
6.0 W12
VS
VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg I (7L)Facelift 20066.0 W12
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster