Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsJaguar F-Pace 25t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
25t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score86/100
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,831 kg4,037 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace25t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,977kg4,359lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 79.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 1,065km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 25t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace25t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Jaguar F-Pace 25t: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 779 km 484 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 1,065 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace25t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace25t | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace25t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 1,065 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 | Jaguar F-Pace 25t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 146 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























