Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2023
VS

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0i

249 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    247.6 mpg US
    297.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,368 km
    4,579 mi
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,814 kg
    3,999 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    601 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
254hp189kW
249hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
1,814kg3,999lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
89.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
34.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,368km4,579mi
Calculated
691km429mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,042mm199in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,648mm65in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,624mm64in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
212mm8in
Trunk volume
264L
601L
Max trunk volume-
1,386L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
70L
67L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
34.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
249 hp
186 kW

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 5 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1,814 kg
3,999 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
229 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55.9 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i7.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 8.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,368 km
4,579 mi
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
691 km
429 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
249 hp
186 kW
7.5 s
229 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
254 hp
189 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
7.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
1,814 kg
3,999 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Range score
7,368 km
4,579 mi
691 km
429 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
Consumption1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.66 LC100 km16.97 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.68 LC100 mi27.32 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used143 L38 US gal31 UK gal1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal
Annual fuel cost249.38 LC/year2,546 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 8.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,678 km (4,149 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 656 kg lighter
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 337 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 P250
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0i
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
EM-P 2.0TD T5
T 2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
2.0i
25t
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-Pace25t
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster