Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,950 kg
    4,299 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    247.6 mpg US
    297.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,368 km
    4,579 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254hp189kW
254hp189kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Gross weight-
2,516kg5,547lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,368km4,579mi
Calculated
1,094km680mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
5,042mm199in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
264L
477L
Max trunk volume-
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
70L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
35.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
230 km/h
143 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55.9 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,368 km
4,579 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,094 km
680 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.9 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
7,368 km
4,579 mi
1,094 km
680 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.66 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.68 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used143 L38 US gal31 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost249.38 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,274 km (3,899 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 520 kg lighter
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 213 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
EM-P 2.0TD T5
T 2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster