Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2021
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2021 T 2.0vsLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 09
EM-P 2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk458 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.0 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range7,368 km4,579 mi
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 2,470kg5,445lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | - |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.1s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 7,368km4,579mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,726mm186in | 5,042mm199in |
| Width | 1,927mm76in | 1,977mm78in |
| Height | 1,606mm63in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 187mm7in | 190mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 458L | 264L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,503L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0 has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 6.2 s |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 5.9 s |
Although Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0 has more power, Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0: 7.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 739 km 459 mi |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 7,368 km 4,579 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
| 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 7,368 km 4,579 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 458 L 16.2 cu ft | 264 L 9.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0 | Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 1.66 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 2.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 143 L38 US gal31 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 249.38 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 605 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 194 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 7.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6,630 km (4,120 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























