Lynk & Co 09
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touareg III (CR)
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.0 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range7,368 km4,579 mi
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score100/100
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest2,029 kg4,473 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | 2,029kg4,473lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 7,368km4,579mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 5,042mm199in | 4,878mm192in |
| Width | 1,977mm78in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,780mm70in | 1,717mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,899mm114in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,684mm66in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 190mm7in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 264L | 810L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,800L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 8.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 7,368 km 4,579 mi |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.8 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
| 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 7,368 km 4,579 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 264 L 9.3 cu ft | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 1.66 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 2.68 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 143 L38 US gal31 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 249.38 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 8.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6,535 km (4,061 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 441 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 546 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























