Lynk & Co 09
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,613 kg3,556 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.0 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range7,368 km4,579 mi
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,470kg5,445lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 7,368km4,579mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 5,042mm199in | 4,509mm178in |
| Width | 1,977mm78in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,780mm70in | 1,684mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,684mm66in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 190mm7in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 264L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 6.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 7,368 km 4,579 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.0 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 |
| 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5 | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.0 L/100 km 247.6 mpg US 297.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 7,368 km 4,579 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 264 L 9.3 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 1.66 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 2.68 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 143 L38 US gal31 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 249.38 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6,563 km (4,078 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 857 kg lighter
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 351 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























