Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 45 TFSIvsLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020

45 TFSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    247.6 mpg US
    297.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,368 km
    4,579 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
265hp198kW
254hp189kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
2,470kg5,445lb
Gross weight
2,445kg5,390lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
70.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
24.0s
Calculated
29.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
933km580mi
Calculated
7,368km4,579mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,682mm184in
5,042mm199in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,977mm78in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance-
190mm7in
Trunk volume
520L
264L
Max trunk volume
1,520L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI5,250-6,500 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.0 s
29.2 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
265 hp
198 kW
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
240 km/h
149 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI6.1 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55.9 s

Although AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI has more power, Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI: 6.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
933 km
580 mi
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,368 km
4,579 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.1 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
265 hp
198 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
5.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
933 km
580 mi
7,368 km
4,579 mi
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km1.66 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi2.68 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal143 L38 US gal31 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year249.38 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 45 TFSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 710 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 256 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,435 km (3,999 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

45 TFSI
50 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
EM-P 2.0TD T5
T 2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
45 TFSI
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
45 TFSI
50 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
45 TFSI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 45 TFSI vs Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster