Car comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSIvsLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

45 TFSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-2024
VS

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    247.6 mpg US
    297.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,368 km
    4,579 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
245hp183kW
254hp189kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
2,470kg5,445lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
-
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
81.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
23.4s
Calculated
29.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
800km497mi
Calculated
7,368km4,579mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,484mm177in
5,042mm199in
Width
1,856mm73in
1,977mm78in
Height
1,616mm64in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance-
190mm7in
Trunk volume
530L
264L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
60L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.4 s
29.3 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
245 hp
183 kW
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
238 km/h
148 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI5.8 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55.9 s

Although Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 6.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
800 km
497 mi
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,368 km
4,579 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
245 hp
183 kW
5.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
5.8 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
245 hp
183 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
5.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
800 km
497 mi
7,368 km
4,579 mi
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km1.66 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi2.68 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal143 L38 US gal31 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year249.38 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 850 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 266 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Uses 6.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,568 km (4,081 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
T 2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
45 TFSI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
45 TFSI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI vs Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster