Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Lynk & Co 900

EM-P 2.0T

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,675 kg
    3,693 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.3 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    823 km
    511 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSILynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
265hp198kW
254hp189kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
2,810kg6,195lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
3,345kg7,374lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
73.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
21.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
125Nm/t83lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
823km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
5,240mm206in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,999mm79in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,810mm71in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
3,160mm124in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,722mm68in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,724mm68in
Ground clearance-
194mm8in
Trunk volume
540L
300L
Max trunk volume-
1,070L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
60L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSILynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSILynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
21.7 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
168 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
2,810 kg
6,195 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
240 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T4.6 s

Although Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has more power, Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
682 km
424 mi
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
823 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
4.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSILynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
265 hp
198 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
4.6 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
823 km
511 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSILynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km12.76 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi20.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year1,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 1,135 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 240 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 141 km (88 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0T
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0T
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
EM-P 2.0T
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster