Car comparison

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 900

EM-P 2.0T

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)

EQE 300 100 kWh

265 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Power
254hp189kW
265hp198kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
2,810kg6,195lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Gross weight
3,345kg7,374lb
3,055kg6,735lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
21.7s
Calculated
35.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
125Nm/t83lb-ft/ton
Calculated
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
-
Length
5,240mm206in
4,863mm191in
Width
1,999mm79in
1,940mm76in
Height
1,810mm71in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
3,160mm124in
3,030mm119in
Front track
1,722mm68in
1,650mm65in
Rear track
1,724mm68in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
181mm7in
Trunk volume
300L
520L
Max trunk volume
1,070L
1,675L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
60L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.7 s
35.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
265 hp
198 kW

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2,370 kg
5,225 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
240 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T4.6 s
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh7.1 s

Although Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh has more power, Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh: 2.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
4.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
265 hp
198 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,863 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Power
254 hp
189 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
7.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
2,370 kg
5,225 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,863 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.76 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 440 kg lighter
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 220 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
EQE 300 100 kWh
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
EM-P 2.0T
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
EQE 300 100 kWh
GLB 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
EQE 300 100 kWh
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 350d
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
EQE 300 100 kWh
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
EQE 300 100 kWh
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2026GLS 350d
EM-P 2.0T
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
EQE 300 100 kWh
GLA 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T vs Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster