Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSIvsLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 900
EM-P 2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,678 kg3,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range823 km511 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,678kg3,699lb | 2,810kg6,195lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 3,345kg7,374lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 73.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 125Nm/t83lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 823km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 5,240mm206in |
| Width | 1,859mm73in | 1,999mm79in |
| Height | 1,656mm65in | 1,810mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 3,160mm124in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,722mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,724mm68in |
| Ground clearance | - | 194mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 652L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,070L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 254 hp 189 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 2,810 kg 6,195 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 4.6 s |
Although Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI has more power, Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 7.3 L/100 km 32.3 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 90 hp/t 67 kW/t 11.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 682 km 424 mi |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 823 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 254 hp 189 kW | 4.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.3 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 7.3 L/100 km 32.3 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | 90 hp/t 67 kW/t 11.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.3 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb | 2,810 kg 6,195 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.3 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 823 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 90 hp/t 67 kW/t 11.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI | Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 12.76 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 20.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 1,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1,132 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 352 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 141 km (87 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























