Car comparison

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TvsMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 900

EM-P 2.0T

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present
VS

Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026

2.0

250 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.3 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    823 km
    511 mi
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0

  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,870 kg
    4,123 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    535 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
254hp189kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
2,810kg6,195lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Gross weight
3,345kg7,374lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
73.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
21.7s
Calculated
28.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
125Nm/t83lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
688km428mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
5,240mm206in
4,873mm192in
Width
1,999mm79in
1,947mm77in
Height
1,810mm71in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
3,160mm124in
2,901mm114in
Front track
1,722mm68in
1,620mm64in
Rear track
1,724mm68in
1,692mm67in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
-
Trunk volume
300L
535L
Max trunk volume
1,070L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
60L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TMaserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0PowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: Power / Torque
  • Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.04,750 rpm2,250 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.7 s
28.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
250 hp
186 kW

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T has 4 hp more than Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 and Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
1,870 kg
4,123 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
240 km/h
149 mph
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
229 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T4.6 s
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.06.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 1.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
823 km
511 mi
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
688 km
428 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
4.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.3 s
229 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,873 mm
191.9 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.6 s
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
254 hp
189 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
6.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,873 mm
191.9 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
688 km
428 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TMaserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.76 LC100 km16.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.53 LC100 mi26.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,914 LC/year2,441 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 940 kg lighter
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 235 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Maserati Grecale 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0
GT 2.0
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsMaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
EM-P 2.0T
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.0
GLB 250
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
EM-P 2.0T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0
Turismo 54 kWh
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
EM-P 2.0T
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T vs Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster