Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 250vsMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 28.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,873mm192in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,687mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,692mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 535L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 4,750 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 28.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 has 26 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 7.0 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 714 km 444 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 | Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























