Volkswagen Tayron II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSIvsMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,734 kg3,823 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score84/100
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
- Largest trunk535 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,734kg3,823lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | 2,310kg5,093lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s Calculated | 28.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,873mm192in |
| Width | 1,866mm73in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,687mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,692mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 345L | 535L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,090L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 4,750 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 28.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI has 15 hp more than Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 and Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 6.1 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 674 km 419 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 345 L 12.2 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI | Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 136 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Has 190 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























