Car comparison

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TvsMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 900

EM-P 2.0T

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present
VS

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,136 kg
    4,709 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254hp189kW
254hp189kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
2,810kg6,195lb
2,136kg4,709lb
Gross weight
3,345kg7,374lb
2,781kg6,131lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
21.7s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
125Nm/t83lb-ft/ton
Calculated
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
1,276km793mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
5,240mm206in
4,995mm197in
Width
1,999mm79in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,810mm71in
1,710mm67in
Wheelbase
3,160mm124in
3,120mm123in
Front track
1,722mm68in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,724mm68in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
170mm7in
Trunk volume
300L
258L
Max trunk volume
1,070L
1,971L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
6
Fuel tank
60L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.7 s
40.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
240 km/h
149 mph
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T4.6 s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 3.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
823 km
511 mi
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
4.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.6 s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
8.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lightness
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
1,276 km
793 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.76 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.53 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,914 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Is 3.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 42 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 674 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 453 km (281 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
EM-P 2.0T
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
EM-P 2.0T
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T vs Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster