Car comparison

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TvsAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 900

EM-P 2.0T

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present
VS

AUDI Q5 III (GU)

2.0 TFSI

268 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Most powerful
    268 hp
    200 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,925 kg
    4,244 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    782 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.3 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    823 km
    511 mi
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
254hp189kW
268hp200kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,810kg6,195lb
1,925kg4,244lb
Gross weight
3,345kg7,374lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
21.7s
Calculated
31.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
125Nm/t83lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
691km430mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
5,240mm206in
4,717mm186in
Width
1,999mm79in
1,900mm75in
Height
1,810mm71in
1,669mm66in
Wheelbase
3,160mm124in
2,817mm111in
Front track
1,722mm68in
-
Rear track
1,724mm68in
-
Ground clearance
194mm8in
-
Trunk volume
300L
782L
Max trunk volume
1,070L
1,611L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
60L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.7 s
31.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
268 hp
200 kW

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
1,925 kg
4,244 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
240 km/h
149 mph
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T4.6 s
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI6.2 s

Although AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has more power, Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
823 km
511 mi
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
691 km
430 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
4.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
268 hp
200 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
268 hp
200 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,669 mm
65.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
268 hp
200 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.6 s
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
254 hp
189 kW
268 hp
200 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
6.2 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
1,925 kg
4,244 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,669 mm
65.7 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
691 km
430 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.76 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.53 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,914 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 885 kg lighter
  • Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 482 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
EM-P 2.0T
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
2.0 TFSI
50 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
EM-P 2.0T
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
EM-P 2.0T
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T vs AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster