Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI · Stage 3vsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI · Stage 2vsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI · Stage 1vsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
2.0 TSI (Stage 2)
Cupra Terramar
2.0 TSI (Stage 1)
Cupra Terramar
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed273 km/h170 mph
- Most powerful397 hp296 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,675 kg3,693 lb
- Best power-to-weight237 hp/t177 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 397hp296kW+132 hp | 344hp257kW+79 hp | 313hp233kW+48 hp | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,290kg5,049lb |
| Top speed | 273 km/h 170 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.8s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-14.5 s Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-9.3 s Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph-5.8 s Calculated | 67.3s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s-1.3 s | 5.0s-0.9 s | 5.3s-0.6 s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.1s-8.3 s Calculated | 16.5s-5.9 s Calculated | 18.4s-4.0 s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.1s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 370Nm/t248lb-ft/ton Calculated | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,519mm178in | 4,519mm178in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,869mm74in | 1,869mm74in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,586mm62in | 1,586mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,681mm106in | 2,681mm106in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L | 540L | 540L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 344 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 313 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 265 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.1 s | 16.5 s | 18.4 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | 273 km/h 170 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 8.8 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.1 s | 13.4 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 118 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph | 175 km/h 108 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 397 hp 296 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 344 hp 257 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 313 hp 233 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW |
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp has 132 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 265 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 265 hp and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp: 132 hp (99 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 4.6 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 5.0 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 5.3 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 265 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 344 hp and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 313 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 682 km 424 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 682 km 424 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 682 km 424 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 397 hp 296 kW | 4.6 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 344 hp 257 kW | 5.0 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)397 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)344 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)313 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI265 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 397 hp 296 kW | 344 hp 257 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 273 km/h 170 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 682 km 424 mi | 682 km 424 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 344 hp | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 313 hp | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 397 hp
- Has 53 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 344 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























