Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsMaserati Grecale GT 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Maserati Grecale

GT 2.0

300 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2026

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati Grecale GT 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    160 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    719 km
    447 mi
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Lightest
    1,675 kg
    3,693 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
Power
265hp198kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
-
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
23.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
719km447mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,846mm191in
Width
1,869mm74in
2,163mm85in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,670mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,901mm114in
Front track
1,590mm63in
-
Rear track
1,580mm62in
-
Trunk volume
540L
535L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIMaserati Grecale GT 2.0PowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Maserati Grecale GT 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.05,750 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
23.1 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
165 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Maserati Grecale GT 2.0 has 35 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Maserati Grecale GT 2.0: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
1,870 kg
4,123 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
240 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.05.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Grecale GT 2.0 and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
160 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
682 km
424 mi
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
719 km
447 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Maserati Grecale GT 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
160 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
5.6 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
719 km
447 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
160 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSIMaserati Grecale GT 2.0
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Maserati Grecale GT 2.0

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Maserati Grecale GT 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
GT 2.0
2.0
VS
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0vsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
GT 2.0
2.0 GDI
VS
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0vsMaseratiLevante2.0 GDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
GT 2.0
AMG GLB 35
VS
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
GT 2.0
JCW 2.0
VS
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
GT 2.0
R 2.0 TSI
VS
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 2022R 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
GT 2.0
3.0 TDI V6
VS
MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Maserati Grecale GT 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster